<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 20 Years Later, Echoes of Tiananmen Square are Heard in Tehran</title>
	<atom:link href="http://danielkeeney.com/20-years-later-echoes-of-tiananmen-square-are-heard-in-tehran/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://danielkeeney.com/20-years-later-echoes-of-tiananmen-square-are-heard-in-tehran/</link>
	<description>The future of the public relations agency</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2012 01:27:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Calvin</title>
		<link>http://danielkeeney.com/20-years-later-echoes-of-tiananmen-square-are-heard-in-tehran/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Calvin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 22:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dankeeney.schipulwp.com/?p=11#comment-7</guid>
		<description>I suspect that Tiananmen and Tehran are happening because too many young people are following Gandhi&#039;s example of peaceful protest. But my understanding is that Gandhi only succeeded because the British were losing a lot of money on their empire and were looking for any excuse to pull out. If Gandhi had launched his protests a decade earlier (or the French) had been in charge of India, we would most likely have seen the slaughter of tens of thousands of Indians. Malaysia/Malaya was another case of the British finding a face-saving way to leave. Ditto Russia (Soviet Union). Russia was going bankrupt holding the Soviet Union ogether. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;However, when we look at most of the recent successful revolutions, most of them were violent - Indonesia, Vietnam, North Korea, Palestine, South Africa. There was either outright war (sponsored by 3rd parties), guerilla warfare, terrorism or a combination of all three.&lt;br /&gt;Well, I may be wrong. My background was a computer systems analyst, not political analyst after all.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suspect that Tiananmen and Tehran are happening because too many young people are following Gandhi&#8217;s example of peaceful protest. But my understanding is that Gandhi only succeeded because the British were losing a lot of money on their empire and were looking for any excuse to pull out. If Gandhi had launched his protests a decade earlier (or the French) had been in charge of India, we would most likely have seen the slaughter of tens of thousands of Indians. Malaysia/Malaya was another case of the British finding a face-saving way to leave. Ditto Russia (Soviet Union). Russia was going bankrupt holding the Soviet Union ogether. </p>
<p>However, when we look at most of the recent successful revolutions, most of them were violent &#8211; Indonesia, Vietnam, North Korea, Palestine, South Africa. There was either outright war (sponsored by 3rd parties), guerilla warfare, terrorism or a combination of all three.<br />Well, I may be wrong. My background was a computer systems analyst, not political analyst after all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

